Monday 27 April 2020

CONSEQUENCES OF WRONGFUL PROSECUTION AND INCARCERATION: A CRITICAL ANALYSIS BY-Ridhima Chandani


“Better that ten guilty person’s escape than that one innocent suffer”- William Blackstone
Delivery of justice is a grave problem in the Indian Justice system. Article 21 of the Constitution of India confers on every person, the fundamental right of life and personal liberty. “Despite this, instances of malicious prosecution and wrongful incarceration of innocent persons are quite common”.
“The National Crime Records Bureau’s (NCRB) annual statistical report called the ‘Prison Statistics India’ contains information with respect to prisons, prisoners and prisons infrastructure[1]”. A review of the data in the PSI shows that across the country under trial prisoners continue to be higher in number than the convict population. Also “the data of the period of incarceration, release, and increase in the number of under-trial prisoners year after year shows that undertrials spent a substantial period of time awaiting trials/ judicial determination of their case. This delay and waiting becomes a graver miscarriage of justice when the person is wrongfully accused and incarcerated pending trial/proceedings, which he should not have been subjected to in the first place.”
“Though the data does not specifically highlight the number of undertrials wrongfully incarcerated or acquitted pursuant to a wrongful prosecution or conviction but the number of prisoners released on acquittal at the first instance and on appeal implies that many of such were the victims of wrongful prosecution and incarceration.”
“The study of Indian laws show that thought the courts has the power to award compensation in cases of wrongful incarceration, imprisonment, etc but there is no set framework or statutory provision within which the right to compensation or the quantum of companysation is determined. This is one of the main reason due to which this problem is increasing year after year.”
“Further, in cases where the compensation has been given by the courts, it did not provide much clarity as to the basis of how the amount of compensation was determined.”
Wrongful prosecution and imprisonment has a significant impact on an individual’s lives.Once a person is released from the jail after spending so many years of his life the trauma does not end on the day of release itself, it becomes so difficult for them to reintegrate back in the society because the society draws no distinction between an accused and a convict.Some of the prisoners either don’t have a family or a home to return to and when they are released they are homeless and face financial insecurity.
While looking for employment they face a lot of barriers due to lack of education and work experience, also the criminal records does not allow him to get back in the society due to the presence of social stigma and stereotypes. They are not able to reconnect with themselves and others. The aftermath of wrongful incarceration includes problems of ruptured relationships, emotional toll and a lack of acceptance in their communities. They experience dislocation from their family and social circles, building relationships for them is very difficult.
“Such people are susceptible to a wide range of psychological consequences like clinical personality change, anxiety disorders, depression, suicides, anger, grief, paranoia, alcohol or drug dependence, memory deficits, traumatic memories or dreams, restlessness, chronic insomnia, among others.[2]
Unlawful detention not only cause loss of years, but can also create social stigma and ostracisation even after being released. “In India, many people are not able to approach the Supreme Court or the High Courts to seek compensation in case of such unlawful detention due to lack of resources so a statutory right or provision is required which will thereby provide a legal remedy to the people and also a systematic framework or means to determine the quantum of compensation to be paid to the victim keeping various factors in consideration.”
The research shows and proves that the wrongful prosecution and incarceration has a severe impact on an individual’s life in every way be it social, economic, physical, mental, etc. Wrongful prosecution and incarceration lead to an increase in the number of under-trial prisoners which further lead to the problem of overcrowding in prisons.There are provisions mentioned in various laws but there is no specific law or statutory provision dealing solely with this issue because of which this problem is increasing year after year.Court has granted compensation in several cases but there was no reasonable ground or means for determining the amount of compensation to be paid. Also, this problem is leading to the pendency of cases in the appellate forums.



[1]National Crime Records Bureau, Prison Statistics India (2018), at17. http://ncrb.gov.in/StatPublications/PSI/Prison2018/PrisonStat2018.htm.
[2]Christina Iannozzi, A Day in the Life the long-term effects and psychological aftermath of wrongful conviction, (Apr, 2015).

Saturday 4 April 2020

Book review : Abhinav Chandrachud's Supreme whispers


Several books are written about the Supreme Court; its evolution, its criticism or just simply about the highlights of this great institution serving the nation but only a few talks about the unheard. Supreme Whispers is one-of-a-kind, a book which will steal a person’s mind by telling them the narratives painted on the walls of the paramount Court of the country. The book provides ample of morsel memoir & reminiscence about judicial rivalries, lobbying, dissent, the pre-collegium system, Special Leave Petitions and what not. Based on George Gadbois’s seminal research work, the book provides ample of sample stories about judicial rivalries, lobbying, dissent, the pre-collegium system, Special Leave Petitions, etc. The book provides insight into the humane perspective of the court. While reading, we are taken into a fascinating journey of the inner workings of the Supreme Court while trying to understand the heavy burden of responsibility that rest on the shoulders of these judges. The reader is taken into an entertaining journey of revelations and facts through Gadbois’ interviews which are coupled with the eloquent strokes of the author regarding the prevalent political and judicial landscapes of the time that creates a stunning legal masterpiece. Gadbois had diligently prepared for each interview and they were a massive success as the judges were brutally frank in their answers. The book, uncannily, explores the inside out of the judges of the Supreme Court which not just includes their attitude towards fellow justices but also towards government. For instance, Justice Shelat, in order to torpedo Justice Bhagwati’s nomination to the Supreme Court,  gave Chief Justice Sikri an impression that Justice Bhagwati was interested in ‘pleasing the government’. The very idea of knowing the secret lives of famous and infamous, known and unknown, male and female justices is so overwhelming that it deserves to be read not only by law students but also by students enrolled in different courses. To understand it in modish scenario, wouldn’t we want to know why the former Chief Justice Dipak Misra has one of the most debatable track record as a judge? Had the author written the book for 2018 Supreme Court judges, the readers would have got an untold insider explanation. An another incidence in the book, the author answers as to why the biggest dissenter of the Supreme Court of India, Justice Subba Rao, did not dissent in a single case after becoming the Chief Justice of India. 
Author Abhinav Chandrachud has divided the book in six chapters. The very first chapter of the book shatters the image of the Supreme Court as a body of consensus. It goes into details of various rivalries, jealousies and tensions between judges of the Supreme Court over matters of ideology or more often, over quite personal matters. Another interesting insight that the book offers is about the most controversial topic in current judicial system i.e. the criteria for the selection of judges for the Supreme Court. Apparently in addition to seniority and merit, the ideological leanings of the judges, their family backgrounds, their suitability to the diversity quota in the SC, and their personal habits were also taken into account while considering their elevation.
All that could be said in end is, the reader is taken on an entertaining journey of revelations and facts through Gadbois’ interviews which are coupled with the eloquent strokes of the author regarding the prevalent political and judicial landscapes of the time that creates a stunning legal masterpiece.