Monday 10 August 2020

THE USE OF ALTERNATIVE DISPUTE RESOLUTION IN PERSONAL INJURY LITIGATION By Prakriti Suthar

 Both in the terms of public spending and legal advice in the private sectors, judicial inefficiency has led to high cost. This is leading towards a growing disaffection with courts. These are raised in line with the increase of these new mechanisms, particularly those that are developed in an online environment. All these are challenging traditional justice avenues by reason of their speed, cost efficiency and flexible, tailored proceedings that detect abnormal patterns of behavior. Hence, it leads to ‘supervising’ the process and outcomes of professionals involved. 

In order to guarantee the quality of the service, information technology facilitates the improvement of such methods.

Arbitration involves a third party who has to be neutral, that is, not from any party and he is responsible for running the process and making decisions which are necessary for solving the disputes. The arbitrator is usually a private person other than any judge who is chosen by the parties themselves.

The person chosen who is chosen by the parties for dispute often has specialized expertise in the subject matter of the dispute, but only if the parties specify, legal training is required.


Personal Injury Claims

Many personal injury claims are suitable for Alternative Dispute Resolution. If utilized properly and with the right type of claim, Alternative Dispute Resolution ( ADR ) can be important in securing the just, speedy and inexpensive determination of the claim.

Mediation

For the purpose of resolving personal injury claims, mediation is a good process to be used. 

Mediated personal injury claims generally have 3 characteristics-

  1. The negotiations taking  place usually involve only the distribution of funds among the parties. 


  1. In the matter of resolving personal injury disputes, the claimant usually is inexperienced.


  1. The issue being mediated is largely subjective.


Before entering into an agreement to mediate a personal injury claim, liability is typically stipulated to by the parties. In addition, just before the meeting, the issue of who pays for any alleged damages is usually established. Because of this, the defendant is not frequently present at the mediation session. Hence, to focus on the issue of damages, the plaintiff, the plaintiff’s attorney, the defendant’s attorney and an adjuster from the defendant’s insurer is present.

Because the mediation process involves a claimant who is probably involved in the only lawsuit, the claimant has been called upon to  evaluate and the insurance  representative may have handled hundreds of similar cases, the mediator is challenged to bring some to the playing field. Hence, it may be beneficial for the plaintiff to be represented by an attorney; for the reason mentioned above.  

The claimant’s injury and pain and suffering are the subjective nature of the personal injury dispute.  To find a suitable criteria which will help out the parties in placing an acceptable value on pain and suffering, is the main challenge for the mediator.

The mediation session usually starts with  both the parties giving a brief  overview of the issues and the parties’ arguments in a joint session. The mediator may caucus with each party separately to discuss each side’s concerns.

At the mediation session, so that the mediator can have access to the records as the case is being discussed; the plaintiff may present a settlement package, including all medical billings and records, as well as other records of special damages, claimed.

To establish communication and rapport with the session as soon as possible is really important for the mediator. The mediator should help out the parties to identify the other interests involved, although distributive interests make up a large part of the personal injury mediation. The desire for an apology or an admission of fault may also be included among these interests.


 Arbitration

An issue of liability which is left unresolved often preludes the use of mediation and use of binding arbitration is required. Cases involving minor impacts and cases with no objective finding of injury which have substantial medical expenses are often more suitable to arbitration due to the defendant’s reluctance to accept the claim or the extent of the claim.

Initially, the parties enter into a written arbitration agreement, establishing the rules for conduct of the hearing, the procedural rules, , enforceability of an award, powers of the arbitration, method of selection of the arbitration who will be hearing the parties present their material evidence and cross examination opposing witnesses. 


No comments:

Post a Comment